[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/PV: properly populate descriptor tables
On 26/10/15 15:08, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 26.10.15 at 15:58, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 26/10/15 14:55, Andrew Cooper wrote: >>> On 26/10/15 14:43, David Vrabel wrote: >>>> On 23/09/15 16:34, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>> Us extending the GDT limit past the Xen descriptors so far meant that >>>>> guests (including user mode programs) accessing any descriptor table >>>>> slot above the original OS'es limit but below the first Xen descriptor >>>>> caused a #PF, converted to a #GP in our #PF handler. Which is quite >>>>> different from the native behavior, where some of such accesses (LAR >>>>> and LSL) don't fault. Mimic that behavior by mapping a blank page into >>>>> unused slots. >>>>> >>>>> While not strictly required, treat the LDT the same for consistency. >>>> This change causes a 32-bit userspace process running in a 32-bit PV >>>> guest to segfault. >>>> >>>> The process is a Go program and it is using the modify_ldt() system call >>>> (which is successful) but loading %gs with the new descriptor causes a >>>> fault. Even a minimal (empty main()) go program faults. >>> D'uh - its obvious now you point it out. >>> >>> By filling the shadow ldt slots as present, zero entries, we break their >>> demand-faulting. >>> >>> We can't be safe to incorrect faults from LAR/LSL, *and* perform demand >>> faulting of the LDT. >> >> Wait. Yes we can. I am talking nonsense. >> >> Hunk 2 should be reverted, and the demand fault handler should populate >> a zero entry rather than passing #GP back to the guest. > > Considering this > > "While not strictly required, treat the LDT the same for consistency." > > in the changelog, simply reverting the LDT part would seem > sufficient to me (albeit that's more than just hunk 2 afaics). Apply this partial revert fixes the problem for me. 8<------------------------ --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm.c @@ -502,8 +502,8 @@ void update_cr3(struct vcpu *v) static void invalidate_shadow_ldt(struct vcpu *v, int flush) { l1_pgentry_t *pl1e; - unsigned int i; - unsigned long pfn, zero_pfn = PFN_DOWN(__pa(zero_page)); + int i; + unsigned long pfn; struct page_info *page; BUG_ON(unlikely(in_irq())); @@ -524,9 +523,8 @@ static void invalidate_shadow_ldt(struct vcpu *v, int flush) for ( i = 16; i < 32; i++ ) { pfn = l1e_get_pfn(pl1e[i]); - if ( !(l1e_get_flags(pl1e[i]) & _PAGE_PRESENT) || pfn == zero_pfn ) - continue; - l1e_write(&pl1e[i], l1e_from_pfn(zero_pfn, __PAGE_HYPERVISOR_RO)); + if ( pfn == 0 ) continue; + l1e_write(&pl1e[i], l1e_empty()); page = mfn_to_page(pfn); ASSERT_PAGE_IS_TYPE(page, PGT_seg_desc_page); ASSERT_PAGE_IS_DOMAIN(page, v->domain); _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |