[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: make compat_iret() domain crash cases distinguishable

>>> On 30.10.15 at 20:05, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 30/10/15 17:46, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Rather than issuing a (mostly) useless separate message, rely on
>> domain_crash() providing enough data, and leverage the line number
>> information it prints.
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
> The messages are not completely useless, and they do save a round-trip
> to the debug symbols (which can be a very long RTT when dealing with
> customers).
> I agree that moving the domain_crash()'s is a good idea, but can we get
> away with just demoing the gprintk()s to gdprintk()s ?

How would that aid with the customer case (who wouldn't normally run
debug hypervisors)?


Xen-devel mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.