Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: make compat_iret() domain crash cases distinguishable

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 30.10.15 at 20:05, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 30/10/15 17:46, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Rather than issuing a (mostly) useless separate message, rely on
>> domain_crash() providing enough data, and leverage the line number
>> information it prints.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
> 
> The messages are not completely useless, and they do save a round-trip
> to the debug symbols (which can be a very long RTT when dealing with
> customers).
> 
> I agree that moving the domain_crash()'s is a good idea, but can we get
> away with just demoing the gprintk()s to gdprintk()s ?

How would that aid with the customer case (who wouldn't normally run
debug hypervisors)?

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel