Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-3.4 test] 64297: regressions - FAIL

[Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 2015-11-16 at 12:06 +0000, osstest service owner wrote:
> flight 64297 linux-3.4 real [real]
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/64297/
> 
> Regressions :-(
> 
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
> Âtest-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64ÂÂ6 xen-bootÂÂÂÂÂÂfail REGR. vs. 
> 62277

baroque0

> Âtest-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsmÂÂ6 xen-bootÂÂfail REGR. vs. 
> 62277

baroque0

> Âtest-amd64-i386-rumpuserxen-i386ÂÂ6 xen-bootÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂfail REGR. vs. 
> 62277

baroque0

> Âtest-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intelÂÂ6 xen-bootÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂfail REGR. vs. 
> 62277

baroque0

(getting a bit bored now ;-)

> Âtest-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64-xsmÂÂ6 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 
> 62277

baroque1 (woo!)

> Âtest-amd64-i386-freebsd10-amd64ÂÂ6 xen-bootÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂfail REGR. vs. 
> 62277

baroque1

> Âtest-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intelÂÂ6 xen-bootÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂfail REGR. vs. 
> 62277

baroque1

> Âtest-amd64-i386-xlÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ6 xen-bootÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂfail REGR. vs. 
> 62277
> Âtest-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64ÂÂ6 xen-bootÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂfail REGR. vs. 
> 62277
> Âtest-amd64-amd64-xl-multivcpuÂÂ6 xen-bootÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂfail REGR. vs. 
> 62277
> Âtest-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64ÂÂ6 xen-bootÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂfail REGR. vs. 
> 62277
> Âtest-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64ÂÂ6 xen-bootÂÂÂÂÂÂfail REGR. vs. 
> 62277
> Âtest-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64ÂÂ6 xen-bootÂÂÂÂÂfail REGR. vs. 
> 62277
> Âtest-amd64-amd64-xl-xsmÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ6 xen-bootÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂfail REGR. vs. 
> 62277
> Âtest-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-winxpsp3ÂÂ6 xen-bootÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂfail REGR. vs. 
> 62277
> Âtest-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3ÂÂ6 xen-bootÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂfail REGR. vs. 
> 62277

Lets just assume these are all baroque*

From:

http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/host/baroque0.html
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/host/baroque1.html

it is pretty clear that baroque* have a problem with booting Linux 3.4. I can 
see jobs which have passed xen-boot on Linux 3.10 onwards.

In:
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/64297/test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intel/serial-baroque1.log

Nov 16 05:07:47.093012 Configuring network interfaces...interface eth0 does not 
exist!
[...]
Nov 16 05:09:09.117011 Starting web server: apache2apache2: 
apr_sockaddr_info_get() failed for baroque1
Nov 16 05:09:49.345119 apache2: Could not reliably determine the server's fully 
qualified domain name, using 127.0.0.1 for ServerName
Nov 16 05:09:49.353021 .

And no sign of a network device.

In a flight with a newer kernel I see:
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/64435/test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intel/serial-baroque0.log

Nov 17 04:12:13.113030 [ÂÂÂÂ4.292477] igb: Intel(R) Gigabit Ethernet Network 
Driver - version 5.0.5-k
Nov 17 04:12:13.121018 [ÂÂÂÂ4.292486] igb: Copyright (c) 2007-2013 Intel 
Corporation.
Nov 17 04:12:13.129030 [ÂÂÂÂ4.292587] Already setup the GSI :17
Nov 17 04:12:13.129063 [ÂÂÂÂ4.320655] igb 0000:02:00.0: added PHC on eth0
Nov 17 04:12:13.137036 [ÂÂÂÂ4.320659] igb 0000:02:00.0: Intel(R) Gigabit 
Ethernet Network Connection
Nov 17 04:12:13.145028 [ÂÂÂÂ4.320662] igb 0000:02:00.0: eth0: 
(PCIe:2.5Gb/s:Width x1) 00:1e:67:af:e4:34
Nov 17 04:12:13.153112 [ÂÂÂÂ4.320706] igb 0000:02:00.0: eth0: PBA No: 102100-000
Nov 17 04:12:13.161188 [ÂÂÂÂ4.320709] igb 0000:02:00.0: Using MSI-X interrupts. 
4 rx queue(s), 4 tx queue(s)
Nov 17 04:12:13.169206 [ÂÂÂÂ4.320779] Already setup the GSI :18
Nov 17 04:12:13.169238 [ÂÂÂÂ4.347944] igb 0000:03:00.0: added PHC on eth1
Nov 17 04:12:13.177019 [ÂÂÂÂ4.347947] igb 0000:03:00.0: Intel(R) Gigabit 
Ethernet Network Connection
Nov 17 04:12:13.185021 [ÂÂÂÂ4.347950] igb 0000:03:00.0: eth1: 
(PCIe:2.5Gb/s:Width x1) 00:1e:67:af:e4:35
Nov 17 04:12:13.193025 [ÂÂÂÂ4.347994] igb 0000:03:00.0: eth1: PBA No: 102100-000
Nov 17 04:12:13.201014 [ÂÂÂÂ4.347996] igb 0000:03:00.0: Using MSI-X interrupts. 
4 rx queue(s), 4 tx queue(s)

And in
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/64435/test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intel/baroque0-output-lspci_-vvv

02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation I210 Gigabit Network Connection 
(rev 03)

Which is the same device as Huxelrebe* has (according to 
<1441877560.24450.365.camel@xxxxxxxxxx>)

Therefore I think it would be appropriate to set host flag 
LinuxKernelMin = 3.5 on Baroque*.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel