[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/4] gdbsx: prefer privcmd character device

To: Doug Goldstein <cardoe@xxxxxxxxxx>
From: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 18:53:28 +0000
Cc: Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@xxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 18:53:52 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

Doug Goldstein writes ("[PATCH 3/4] gdbsx: prefer privcmd character device"):
> Prefer using the character device over the proc file if the character
> device exists.

I think this common logic (which also appears in your 1/4 patch)
should be factored out.

Could gdbsx not use a libxc handle ?

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/4] gdbsx: prefer privcmd character device
  - From: Ian Campbell
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/4] gdbsx: prefer privcmd character device
  - From: Doug Goldstein

References:
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/4] libxc: prefer using privcmd character device
  - From: Doug Goldstein
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/4] gdbsx: prefer privcmd character device
  - From: Doug Goldstein

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 4/4] xendomains initscript: test for privcmd char device
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable-smoke test] 65076: tolerable all pass - PUSHED
Previous by thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/4] gdbsx: prefer privcmd character device
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/4] gdbsx: prefer privcmd character device
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.