Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 65094: regressions - FAIL

[Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 2015-11-26 at 01:55 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > On 25.11.15 at 20:32, <osstest-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > flight 65094 xen-unstable real [real]
> > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/65094/ 
> > 
> > Regressions :-(
> > 
> > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> > including tests which could not be run:
> > Âtest-amd64-i386-rumpuserxen-i386 10 guest-startÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂfail REGR.
> > vs. 64035
> 
> This being the only regression and ...
> 
> > version targeted for testing:
> > ÂxenÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ0c3f24645b07b875bc1294fb4627f01e030690fe
> > baseline version:
> > ÂxenÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ22a1fbb575df3a3a7726cdeb5ddf19cc8f60827c
> 
> ... this not being the commit force pushed yesterday, I think this
> warrants another force push.

22a1fbb575df3a3a7726cdeb5ddf19cc8f60827c is beforeÂ
827db7b26384ce083df7154d77f13379b2cf4121, and 22a1fbb was also the basis
for flight 65066 which was the other force push.

So all that has happened is that this flight was already under way when I
did the force push. The currently in progress flight (65114) will use the
new baseline and therefore not thingÂtest-amd64-i386-rumpuserxen-i386 is
regressing any longer.

So while we could force push we can also just wait for 65114.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel