[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: drop dummy input from alternative_{input, io}()

To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 13:21:51 +0000
Cc: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 13:21:57 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

On 27/11/15 11:52, Jan Beulich wrote:
> We don't need the claimed API compatibility. No change in generated
> code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

References:
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: drop dummy input from alternative_{input, io}()
  - From: Jan Beulich

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/HVM: XSETBV intercept needs to check CPL on SVM only
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.6-testing test] 65112: regressions - FAIL
Previous by thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: drop dummy input from alternative_{input, io}()
Next by thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: properly macroize the two XRSTOR flavors
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.