Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 6/9] xenstore: don't start xenstore domain if already one is active

[Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 2015-12-15 at 13:28 +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 15/12/15 13:23, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Fri, 2015-12-11 at 16:47 +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > > Don't start a new xenstore domain in case one is already detected to
> > > be running.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > Âtools/xenstore/init-xenstore-domain.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > > Â1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/tools/xenstore/init-xenstore-domain.c
> > > b/tools/xenstore/init-
> > > xenstore-domain.c
> > > index 068887c..0ca7eed 100644
> > > --- a/tools/xenstore/init-xenstore-domain.c
> > > +++ b/tools/xenstore/init-xenstore-domain.c
> > > @@ -66,7 +66,8 @@ static int build(xc_interface *xch)
> > > Â } else {
> > > Â         ssid = SECINITSID_DOMU;
> > > Â }
> > > - rv = xc_domain_create(xch, ssid, handle, 0, &domid, NULL);
> > > + rv = xc_domain_create(xch, ssid, handle,
> > > XEN_DOMCTL_CDF_xs_domain,
> > > +                 ÂÂÂÂÂÂ&domid, NULL);
> > 
> > Doesn't this bit belong earlier on in the series?
> 
> I can make this patch number 3 of the series, if you like.

Not part of the patch which adds the setting?

NB, I think you mean just this hunk rather than reordering this patch?
That's what I was trying to get at at least.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel