Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 2/5] libxl: Fix libxl_set_memory_target return value

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] libxl: Fix libxl_set_memory_target 
return value"):
> On Mon, 2016-01-04 at 17:37 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Can you go back to `lrc' for just that one use ?  I think that would
> > be analogous with CODING_STYLE's suggestion to use `rc' for libxl
> > error codes.
> 
> I was never quite sure what the "l" was supposed to reference, local?

It seems to mean `local' to me.  I was going to suggest `lrc' for this
variable name even before I saw that it had already been `lrc' in a
previous patch, which suggests it's a local maximum in probability
space...

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel