Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 78054: regressions - FAIL

[Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 2016-01-14 at 14:44 +0000, osstest service owner wrote:
> flight 78054 linux-linus real [real]
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/78054/
> 
> Regressions :-(
> 
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
> Âtest-amd64-amd64-xl-credit2ÂÂ19 guest-start/debian.repeat fail REGR. vs. 
> 59254

http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/history/test-amd64-amd64-xl-credit2/linux-linus.html

looks to be a infrequent failure, unlucky on this occasion.

> Âtest-armhf-armhf-xl-cubietruckÂÂ6 xen-bootÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂfail REGR. vs. 
> 59254

Jan 14 11:14:19.336263 [ÂÂÂÂ6.683272] sun4i-ss 1c15000.crypto-engine: Die ID 0
Jan 14 11:14:19.341246 [ÂÂÂÂ7.501227] Unable to handle kernel paging request at 
virtual address 000027e4
Jan 14 11:14:20.156925 [ÂÂÂÂ7.501306] pgd = c0204000
Jan 14 11:14:20.159665 [ÂÂÂÂ7.501325] [000027e4] *pgd=00000000
Jan 14 11:14:20.163296 [ÂÂÂÂ7.501362] Internal error: Oops: 17 [#1] SMP ARM
Jan 14 11:14:20.168045 [ÂÂÂÂ7.501401] Modules linked in: brcmfmac cfg80211 
brcmutil axp20x_usb_power sun4i_ss des_generic
Jan 14 11:14:20.177078 [ÂÂÂÂ7.501476] CPU: 0 PID: 4 Comm: kworker/0:0 Not 
tainted 4.4.0+ #1
Jan 14 11:14:20.183048 [ÂÂÂÂ7.501504] Hardware name: Allwinner sun7i (A20) 
Family
Jan 14 11:14:20.188301 [ÂÂÂÂ7.501588] Workqueue: events brcmf_driver_register 
[brcmfmac]
Jan 14 11:14:20.194178 [ÂÂÂÂ7.501630] task: db060fc0 ti: db074000 task.ti: 
db074000
Jan 14 11:14:20.199672 [ÂÂÂÂ7.501693] PC is at brcmf_ops_sdio_probe+0x290/0x428 
[brcmfmac]
[...]

Looks to be a known issue:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2162290.html

> Âtest-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpuÂÂ6 xen-bootÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂfail REGR. vs. 
> 59254

Same as above.

> Âtest-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 9 debian-hvm-install 
> fail REGR. vs. 59254

Covered by <22165.11872.378852.10093@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> Âtest-amd64-i386-rumpuserxen-i386 10 guest-startÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂfail REGR. vs. 
> 59254

This is a known regression which we have been force pushing, but not in the
presence of all of the above.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel