Re: [Xen-devel] VPMU backports for 4.6

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 20.01.16 at 18:36, <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> (As a side --- XSA-163 says that VPMU is "unsupported security-wise". Do 
> we make any distinction between a feature being generally or 
> security-wise unsupported?)

Not sure; considering stable tree maintenance one might imply
general support to be a superset of security support. But I can
easily see other views on that being equally possible/legitimate.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel