[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Prototype Code Review Dashboards (input required)
> On 9 Mar 2016, at 17:06, Daniel Izquierdo <dizquierdo@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 02/03/16 23:45, Daniel Izquierdo wrote: > > [...] >>> Given, that the Xen-A1.A2.A3 dash board is quite busy, we should keep that >>> separate. >>> >>> >>> >> >> I still have to upload this, sorry for the delay! >> >> >> This is a summary of the actions unless extra comments are provided: >> >> * Balance should be calculated as reviews - patches >> * Cleaning actions in the dataset when finding multiple email addresses >> * Bugs with the post-ack comments >> * Add the extra panel defined as use case A.0 >> >> Some extra feedback or discussion: >> >> * Reduce the flags to be used. We're currently using all of the flags >> available and sub-setting the reviewed-by and acked-by >> * I'm not sure if we need extra discussion related to the merge:1 filter >> * Check how reviews and patches are counted. Any new version of a patch is >> counted as a new patch. Any new reviewed-by flag in a reply to a patch is >> counted as a review. > Thank you for the progress update > From those actions, this is the current status: > > * Balance should be calculated as reviews - patches (DONE) > * Cleaning actions in the dataset when finding multiple email addresses > (still in progress and I should add your comments in a previous email) > * Bugs with the post-ack comments (DONE) > * Add the extra panel defined as use case A.0 (DONE) I noticed that the naming of fields in the panels have inconsistent names, e.g. patchserie_sender_domain vs sender_domain That makes writing queries hard and, if possible, should be cleaned up at some stage > * Tables at the bottom of the panels contains proper information and not all > of the fields (DONE) > * Do not count comments to your own patches (to be done) Note that we thus should also not count post-ACK comments on own patches > Regarding to the extra feedback: > * Reduce the flags to be used. We're currently using all of the flags > available and sub-setting the reviewed-by and acked-by. > ** This opened a new discussion about the CC mailing lists and the creation > of some buckets of info. We should discuss the best way forward > * I'm not sure if we need extra discussion related to the merge:1 filter > ** No advances Are there any areas where you need my input. I think there were 2 issues a) One generally with uninitialised values : however that applies to other flags also b) One about the views not shown : I think that is OK and fixing a) would make it clear what values are defined and which are not > * Check how reviews and patches are counted. Any new version of a patch is > counted as a new patch. Any new reviewed-by flag in a reply to a patch is > counted as a review. > ** No advances I think these are both OK. Rationale: - Reviewed by flags can be removed and then added again. As we count multiple review comments, we can count multiple reviewed-by - As for counting a new version of a patch as a separate one, I think we need some discussion Firstly, we need to be careful of is that we don't include old versions of a patches/patchseries within the uncommitted backlog. Also, we need to make sure that counting of patch related items (e.g. reviews) are consistent with how we count patches. Regards Lars _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |