Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 3/3] xl: new "loglvl" command

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 15.03.16 at 15:51, <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> As for the second, I was thinking about downgrading or upgrading to a
> different log level -- what would you do to the hypervisor command line
> option guest_loglvl if one of the log levels is gone? Do you just crash
> xen or setting log level to some other value? I think libxl can follow
> this same principle.

Certainly not crash Xen. I guess the most natural thing would be
to ignore the bad request, as we do now for log level string we
can't make sense of.

> But then you are of the opinion that it should just return error if one
> log level is gone -- I think this is probably fine too , we just need to
> document the semantics the API.

I think that's a reasonable route then.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel