[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 06/34] x86/arm: Add BUGFRAME_NR define and BUILD checks.

To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ross.lagerwall@xxxxxxxxxx, konrad@xxxxxxxxxx, andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx, mpohlack@xxxxxxxxx, sasha.levin@xxxxxxxxxx
From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:49:27 +0000
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:49:43 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

Hi Konrad,

On 15/03/2016 17:56, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:

So that we have a nice mechansim to figure out the upper
bounds of bug.frames and also catch compiler errors in case
one tries to use a higher frame number.

Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>


For the ARM part:

Acked-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>

Regards,

--
Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

References:
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4] xSplice v1 design and implementation.
  - From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 06/34] x86/arm: Add BUGFRAME_NR define and BUILD checks.
  - From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk

Prev by Date: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable-coverity test] 86387: all pass - PUSHED
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.3-testing test] 86333: regressions - trouble: blocked/broken/fail/pass
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 06/34] x86/arm: Add BUGFRAME_NR define and BUILD checks.
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 06/34] x86/arm: Add BUGFRAME_NR define and BUILD checks.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.