Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 0/2] Make the pcidevs_lock a recursive one

[Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 2016-03-17 at 01:39 +0000, Xu, Quan wrote:
> On March 16, 2016 6:45pm, <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > Quan - before sending such pings, please be sure to actually check
> > the staging
> > branch. And generally Dario is right - if anything, you should have
> > pinged
> > Suravee for his missing ack, and not everyone (i.e. the list).
> > 
> Yes, you are right. I will follow it.
> Before I send out pings, I have checked it on the http://xenbits.xen.
> org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=summary,
> and I can't find this patch set.
> 
Right, but that is the 'master' branch.

As you probably know, patches are not committed to master, they're
committed to 'staging', and then move to 'master' when they pass
OSSTest's gate.

As you said yourself in your ping request, what you wanted to know was
whether the patches were already in the 'staging' branch, which, if you
want to use the web interface, is here:

http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/staging

(and has the patches).

Regards,
Dario
-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel