Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v7 for Xen 4.7 1/4] xen: enable per-VCPU parameter settings for RTDS scheduler

[Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 2016-03-18 at 01:39 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > 
> > > > On 17.03.16 at 21:42, <lichong659@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:03 AM, Dario Faggioli
> > <dario.faggioli@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > 
> > > I'd say that, in this specific case, is not a big deal which one
> > > of the
> > > two approaches you take (mentioning or separate patch), but the
> > > having
> > > a separate one is indeed almost always preferable (e.g., the fix
> > > can be
> > > backported).
> > If I choose mentioning, do I move the comment to the changelog? Or
> > do I keep
> > it here and say it again in the changelog?
> Just consider what would happen if everyone mentioned in
> comments the bugs they fixed. I think the answer to you question
> is obvious then...
>
Exactly! :-)

And, please (Chong), let me restate this: "having a separate one is
indeed almost always preferable (e.g., the fix can be backported)"

Regards,
Dario
-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel