[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] Policy for force pushing smoke branch Was: Re: [xen-unstable-smoke test] 88656: regressions - FAIL
Wei Liu writes ("Policy for force pushing smoke branch Was: Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable-smoke test] 88656: regressions - FAIL"): > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 01:15:53PM +0000, osstest service owner wrote: > > flight 88656 xen-unstable-smoke real [real] > > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/88656/ > > > > Regressions :-( > > > > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, > > including tests which could not be run: > > build-amd64-libvirt 5 libvirt-build fail REGR. vs. > > 88144 > > > > Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: > > test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a > > This failed because libvirt doesn't set LIBXL_API_VERSION. It is not a > bug in Xen code base. > > I don't think we have precedent of force-pushing smoke branch, so we > need to decide what to do here. Indeed. > It would take some time for libvirt fix to land and propagate to our own > mirror. There is also a risk that the libvirt fix wouldn't pass osstest's push gate for the libvirt branch. > I would like to avoid holding backing xen.git push for too long > if possible. So I'm for force-pushing the smoke branch and subsequently > master branch if necessary. I concur. I will wait a bit for contrary opinions, though. Thanks, Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |