Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: Add comment for missing FROZEN notifier transitions

[Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 04/04/2016 12:30 PM, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 04/04/16 17:21, Julien Grall wrote:
> > (CC Stefano new e-mail address)
> >
> > Hello Anna-Maria,
> >
> > On 04/04/2016 13:32, Anna-Maria Gleixner wrote:
> > > Xen guests do not offline/online CPUs during suspend/resume and
> > > therefore FROZEN notifier transitions are not required. Add this
> > > explanation as a comment in the code to get not confused why
> > > CPU_TASKS_FROZEN masked transitions are not considered.
> Alternatively, these could be added even if they are not encountered.
> This might be more future-proof but the documentation might be clearer.
>
> Boris, Juergen, any opinion?
Wouldn't the same comment need to be added to xen_hvm_cpu_notify()?


-boris


> David>> --- a/drivers/xen/events/events_fifo.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/xen/events/events_fifo.c
> > > @@ -425,6 +425,12 @@ static int evtchn_fifo_cpu_notification(
> > >        int cpu = (long)hcpu;
> > >        int ret = 0;
> > >
> > > +    /*
> > > +     * Xen guests do not offline/online CPUs during
> > > +     * suspend/resume, thus CPU_TASKS_FROZEN masked transitions
> > > +     * are not considered.
> > > +    */
> > NIT: The '*' is not aligned with the others.
> If this doesn't need any other changes, I'll fix this on commit.
>
> David

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel