[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 4/6] xen: add xen_pin_vcpu() to support calling functions on a dedicated pcpu
- To: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>, <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 11:03:55 +0100
- Cc: jeremy@xxxxxxxx, jdelvare@xxxxxxxx, peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx, rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, chrisw@xxxxxxxxxxxx, mingo@xxxxxxxxxx, tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, Douglas_Warzecha@xxxxxxxx, hpa@xxxxxxxxx, akataria@xxxxxxxxxx, boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx, linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 10:04:21 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>
On 05/04/16 11:01, Juergen Gross wrote:
>
> No, I don't think this is a good idea. In the EINVAL or EBUSY case a
> simple Xen admin command might be enough to make the next call succeed.
> I don't want to disable pinning in this case.
Ok.
Acked-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>
David
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
