Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 0/5] xentrace/xenalyze Support on ARM

[Ben Sanda <Ben.Sanda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Jan, 

> A couple of formal things: This is v3, and I only now notice
> indeed I should have looked at some of the patches. Yet which of them
> isn't clear - I'm being Cc-ed on all of them, instead of just the ones
> that submission guidelines say I should be. And then all patch
> subjects start with xenalyze: or xentrace:, suggesting this series
> isn't touching code other than those two. Generalization of
> {get,put}_pg_owner(), otoh, while apparently a prereq for the
> generalization of one or both of the two, should use a more indicative
> component prefix (or maybe even none at all).

Thank you for the comments, I will update the names of the patches so
they are more obvious as to what they touch. As far as the CC'ing
though, I'm not sure how to do this. When I create the patch and send
it out  with git send-email I send one email for the entire patch set
with one CC list. I don't know of a method to send a patch set but
have each individual patch go to a different CC list.

Thanks,
Ben


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel