[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 08/11] xen: sched: allow for choosing credit2 runqueues configuration at boot
On Thu, 2016-04-07 at 16:04 +0100, George Dunlap wrote: > On 07/04/16 06:04, Juergen Gross wrote: > > On 06/04/16 19:23, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > > @@ -2170,6 +2234,8 @@ csched2_init(struct scheduler *ops) > > > printk(" load_window_shift: %d\n", opt_load_window_shift); > > > printk(" underload_balance_tolerance: %d\n", > > > opt_underload_balance_tolerance); > > > printk(" overload_balance_tolerance: %d\n", > > > opt_overload_balance_tolerance); > > > + printk(" runqueues arrangement: per-%s\n", > > > + opt_runqueue == OPT_RUNQUEUE_CORE ? "core" : > > > "socket"); > > I asked this before: shouldn't the optiones "node" and "all" be > > respected here, too? > Dario, would it make sense to put the string names ("core", "socket", > &c) in an array, then have both parse_credit2_runqueue() iterate over > the array to find the appropriate numeric value, and have this use > the > array to convert from the numeric value to a string? > Ok, I'll do that. Even if I do, though, I can't get rid of the OPT_RUNQUEUE_CORE, etc., symbols, as I need to figure out what the numeric value found during parsing actually means in cpu_to_runqueue(). I know you're not mentioning this, but I felt like I better make this clear, in case one would expect for those to go away too. In any case, you'll see this in the patch. Thanks and Regards, Dario -- <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) Attachment:
signature.asc _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |