[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Remus and blktap2
I tried to upstream the DRBD code few years ago, but the maintainers were not willing to accept the patch, stating that stating that I had not proved that the entire Remus system implementation (memory and disk replication) was tolerant to all forms of system errors and maintain consistency of the disk. Not sure why this mattered to them, as the checkpoint based disk replication protocol could be used independent of Remus for any other system, just like the way companies like Yelp are using the Remus' plug qdisc for controlling their application interaction with network, without using any other part of Remus. Sigh The only reason to stick to DRBD is because of its resynchronization capabilities. If that is not needed, a Remus style disk replication can be done using Qemu's disk backends. I am out of sync with the current status of disk backends that Qemu offers and Xen supports. So I apologize in advance for any factual inaccuracies. On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 7:35 AM Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx> wrote: Hi, -- ~shriram _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |