[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/time: fix gtime_to_gtsc for vtsc=1 PV guests



>>> On 25.04.16 at 13:18, <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
> 
> For vtsc=1 PV guests, rdtsc is trapped and calculated from get_s_time()
> using gtime_to_gtsc. Similarly the tsc_timestamp, part of struct
> vcpu_time_info, is calculated from stime_local_stamp using
> gtime_to_gtsc.
> 
> However gtime_to_gtsc can return 0, if time < vtsc_offset, which can
> actually happen when gtime_to_gtsc is called passing stime_local_stamp
> (the caller function is __update_vcpu_system_time).
> 
> In that case the pvclock protocol doesn't work properly and the guest is
> unable to calculate the system time correctly. As a consequence when the
> guest tries to set a timer event (for example calling the
> VCPUOP_set_singleshot_timer hypercall), the event will be in the past
> causing Linux to hang.
> 
> The purpose of the pvclock protocol is to allow the guest to calculate
> the system_time in nanosec correctly. The guest calculates as follow:
> 
>   from_vtsc_scale(rdtsc - vcpu_time_info.tsc_timestamp) + 
> vcpu_time_info.system_time
> 
> Given that with vtsc=1:
>   rdtsc = to_vtsc_scale(NOW() - vtsc_offset)
>   vcpu_time_info.tsc_timestamp = to_vtsc_scale(vcpu_time_info.system_time - 
> vtsc_offset)
> 
> The expression evaluates to NOW(), which is what we want.  However when
> stime_local_stamp < vtsc_offset, vcpu_time_info.tsc_timestamp is
> actually 0. As a consequence the calculated overall system_time is not
> correct.
> 
> This patch fixes the issue by letting gtime_to_gtsc return a negative
> integer in the form of a wrapped around unsigned integer, thus when the
> guest subtracts vcpu_time_info.tsc_timestamp from rdtsc will calculate
> the right value.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>

Assuming you mean for this to go into 4.7, I've added Wei to Cc
(and you should do so in case of re-submission).

> --- a/xen/arch/x86/time.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/time.c
> @@ -1663,7 +1663,13 @@ custom_param("tsc", tsc_parse);
>  u64 gtime_to_gtsc(struct domain *d, u64 time)
>  {
>      if ( !is_hvm_domain(d) )
> +    {
>          time = max_t(s64, time - d->arch.vtsc_offset, 0);

This line should have been deleted. While I'd be happy to do this
while committing, its presence raises the question of whether
things actually work as expected.

Jan

> +        if ( time < d->arch.vtsc_offset )
> +            return -scale_delta(d->arch.vtsc_offset - time,
> +                                &d->arch.ns_to_vtsc);
> +        time -= d->arch.vtsc_offset;
> +    }
>      return scale_delta(time, &d->arch.ns_to_vtsc);
>  }
>  




_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.