Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST PATCH] crontab: Drop linux-mingo-tip-master linux-next linux-linus

[Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>]

On 22/04/16 19:08, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 03:54:43PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> It appears that no-one is looking at the output.  These have not had a
>> push to the tested output branch for at least 250 days (742 days in
>> the case of linux-linus!) and the reports don't seem to be generating
>> any bugfixing activity.
>>
>> There is a plan to do some Xen testing in Zero-day but even if that
>> doesn't lead to anything we would still be just where we are now.
>>
>> So drop these to save our test bandwith for more useful work.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> CC: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> CC: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> CC: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> CC: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> CC: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> CC: Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> CC: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
>> CC: Anshul Makkar <anshul.makkar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> This looks fine to me, but I think I needs to be Acked by the Linux 
> maintainers. FWIW:

Acked-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>

> 
> Acked-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
>> ---
>>  crontab |    5 ++---
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/crontab b/crontab
>> index 2cfad74..6ddc2b8 100755
>> --- a/crontab
>> +++ b/crontab
>> @@ -7,10 +7,9 @@ MAILTO=ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxx,ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>  49          1       * * *           cd testing.git && 
>> BRANCHES_ALWAYS=xen-unstable  ./cr-for-branches branches -w 
>> "./cr-daily-branch --real"
>>  0           *       * * *           cd testing.git && 
>> BRANCHES=xen-unstable-smoke   ./cr-for-branches branches -q 
>> "./cr-daily-branch --real"
>>  4-59/30             *       * * *           cd testing.git &&               
>>                 ./cr-for-branches branches -q "./cr-daily-branch --real"
>> -18          9       * * 1,3,5       cd testing.git && BRANCHES=linux-next   
>>         ./cr-for-branches branches -w "./cr-daily-branch --real"
>>  18          9       * * 3,7         cd testing.git && 
>> BRANCHES=xen-unstable-coverity ./cr-for-branches branches -w 
>> "./cr-daily-branch --real"
>> -18          4       * * *           cd testing.git && BRANCHES='linux-linus 
>> linux-mingo-tip-master linux-3.0 libvirt rumpuserxen' ./cr-for-branches 
>> branches -w "./cr-daily-branch --real"
>> -6-59/15     *       * * *           cd testing.git && 
>> EXTRA_BRANCHES='linux-linus linux-3.0 rumpuserxen libvirt' ./cr-for-branches 
>> bisects -w "./cr-try-bisect --real"
>> +18          4       * * *           cd testing.git && BRANCHES='linux-3.0 
>> libvirt rumpuserxen' ./cr-for-branches branches -w "./cr-daily-branch --real"
> 
> Is this linux-3.0 branch actually Linux 3.0? Should we really be testing 
> that? (It's quite old TBH, and it's not even maintained upstream, oldest 
> longterm is 3.2).
> 
> Roger.
> 


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel