[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 06/10] IOMMU/MMU: propagate IOMMU Device-TLB flush error up to iommu_iotlb_flush{, _all} (top level ones).
>>> On 06.05.16 at 10:54, <quan.xu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > --- a/xen/common/memory.c > +++ b/xen/common/memory.c > @@ -677,9 +677,19 @@ static int xenmem_add_to_physmap(struct domain *d, > #ifdef CONFIG_HAS_PASSTHROUGH > if ( need_iommu(d) ) > { > + int ret; > + > this_cpu(iommu_dont_flush_iotlb) = 0; > - iommu_iotlb_flush(d, xatp->idx - done, done); > - iommu_iotlb_flush(d, xatp->gpfn - done, done); > + > + ret = iommu_iotlb_flush(d, xatp->idx - done, done); > + > + if ( rc >= 0 && unlikely(ret) ) > + rc = ret; > + > + ret = iommu_iotlb_flush(d, xatp->gpfn - done, done); > + > + if ( rc >= 0 && unlikely(ret) ) > + rc = ret; In both cases I think it would be preferable to switch the two sides of the &&. > --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c > +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c > @@ -312,24 +312,29 @@ static void iommu_free_pagetables(unsigned long unused) > cpumask_cycle(smp_processor_id(), > &cpu_online_map)); > } > > -void iommu_iotlb_flush(struct domain *d, unsigned long gfn, unsigned int > page_count) > +int __must_check iommu_iotlb_flush(struct domain *d, unsigned long gfn, > + unsigned int page_count) The annotation generally belongs on declarations; the only exception are static functions which don't have any (i.e. they get defined before first getting used). > --- a/xen/include/xen/iommu.h > +++ b/xen/include/xen/iommu.h > @@ -200,8 +200,9 @@ int iommu_do_pci_domctl(struct xen_domctl *, struct > domain *d, > int iommu_do_domctl(struct xen_domctl *, struct domain *d, > XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(xen_domctl_t)); > > -void iommu_iotlb_flush(struct domain *d, unsigned long gfn, unsigned int > page_count); > -void iommu_iotlb_flush_all(struct domain *d); > +int __must_check iommu_iotlb_flush(struct domain *d, unsigned long gfn, > + unsigned int page_count); > +int __must_check iommu_iotlb_flush_all(struct domain *d); I.e. these changes suffice, repeating the annotations on the function definitions is redundant with the ones put here. With respective adjustments done Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |