Re: [Xen-devel] [REVERT] blktap2: Use RING_COPY_REQUEST

[Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 02:44:19PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 04:00:39AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > >>> On 02.05.16 at 12:16, <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 02:44:25AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > >> Short of getting any feedback on the previous discussion item
> > >> http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-03/msg00571.html
> > >>  
> > >> here's a formal revert request: Please revert commit 19f6c522a6
> > >> from the staging tree (afaict it didn't get mirrored to any of the
> > >> stable trees yet), as the changes it does are not necessary and
> > >> possibly misleading.
> > > 
> > > FWIW your analysis in the other thread makes sense to me. There doesn't
> > > seem to be interaction between untrusted frontend and backend.
> > 
> > Since there was no further follow-up: Can the above be taken as
> > an ack (and a release ack for one)?
> > 
> 
> Doesn't this need an ack from member(s) of the security team before it
> can be committed? It is related to an XSA after all.
> 
> I don't have clear idea how to proceed in this case TBH. In any case:
> 
> Acked-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> And subject to an ack from security team member:
> 
> Release-acked-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>


Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Wei.
> 
> > Jan
> > 

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel