Re: [Xen-devel] [TESTDAY] Test report - xl sched-rtds

[Meng Xu <mengxu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 5:31 AM, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 02:00:06PM -0500, Chong Li wrote:
>> * Hardware:
>> CPU: Intel Core2 Quad Q9400
>> Total Memory: 2791088 kB
>>
>> * Software:
>> Ubuntu 14.04
>> Linux kernel: 3.13.0-68
>>
>> * Guest operating systems:
>> Ubuntu 14.04 (PV)
>>
>> * Functionality tested:
>> xl sched-rtds (for set/get per-VCPU parameters)
>>
>> * Comments:
>> All examples about "xl sched-rtds" in xl mannual page
>> <http://xenbits.xen.org/docs/unstable/man/xl.1.html#DOMAIN-SUBCOMMANDS>
>> have been tested,
>> and all run successfully.
>>
>> If users type in wrong parameters (e.g., budget > period), the
>> error/warnning messages
>> are returned correctly as well.
>>
>
> Good, so RTDS works as expected. Thanks for your report.

Hi Wei,

I'd like to share some of my experience with the improved RTDS scheduler.
It is not a formal report. But hopefully it is some useful information.

I have been using the improved RTDS in the staging for a while. I
haven't seen any weird issue. Because I also modify the other parts of
Xen a bit, so the test is not for xen 4.7-rc2 though. That's why we
have Chong test the xen 4.7-rc2. Thank you very much, Chong, for your
nice test report! :-)

The workload types I run are:
1) Compile linux or xen kernels in parallel. The number of compiling
jobs is usually double the number of cores allocated for dom0.
2) Run cpu-intensive task or memory-intensive task,which access a large array.

Best,

Meng

-- 
Meng Xu
PhD Student in Computer and Information Science
University of Pennsylvania
http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~mengxu/

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel