[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 1/4] tmem: Move global stats in a tmem_statistics structure
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 09:01:00PM -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote: > On 5/17/16 8:57 PM, Doug Goldstein wrote: > > On 5/16/16 10:58 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > >> And adjust the macro: atomic_inc_and_max to update the structure. > >> > >> Sadly one entry: pool->pgp_count cannot use this macro anymore > >> so unroll the macro for this instance. > >> > >> No functional change. The name has the 'tmem_stats' as it will > >> be eventually non-local. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> xen/common/tmem.c | 135 > >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------- > >> 1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/xen/common/tmem.c b/xen/common/tmem.c > >> index 16e249a..d362eae 100644 > >> --- a/xen/common/tmem.c > >> +++ b/xen/common/tmem.c > >> @@ -28,25 +28,32 @@ > >> #define TMEM_SPEC_VERSION 1 > >> > >> /* Global statistics (none need to be locked). */ > >> -static unsigned long total_tmem_ops = 0; > >> -static unsigned long errored_tmem_ops = 0; > >> -static unsigned long total_flush_pool = 0; > >> -static unsigned long alloc_failed = 0, alloc_page_failed = 0; > >> -static unsigned long evicted_pgs = 0, evict_attempts = 0; > >> -static unsigned long relinq_pgs = 0, relinq_attempts = 0; > >> -static unsigned long max_evicts_per_relinq = 0; > >> -static unsigned long low_on_memory = 0; > >> -static unsigned long deduped_puts = 0; > >> -static unsigned long tot_good_eph_puts = 0; > >> -static int global_obj_count_max = 0; > >> -static int global_pgp_count_max = 0; > >> -static int global_pcd_count_max = 0; > >> -static int global_page_count_max = 0; > >> -static int global_rtree_node_count_max = 0; > >> -static long global_eph_count_max = 0; > >> -static unsigned long failed_copies; > >> -static unsigned long pcd_tot_tze_size = 0; > >> -static unsigned long pcd_tot_csize = 0; > >> +struct tmem_statistics { > >> + unsigned long total_tmem_ops; > >> + unsigned long errored_tmem_ops; > >> + unsigned long total_flush_pool; > >> + unsigned long alloc_failed; > >> + unsigned long alloc_page_failed; > >> + unsigned long evicted_pgs; > >> + unsigned long evict_attempts; > >> + unsigned long relinq_pgs; > >> + unsigned long relinq_attempts; > >> + unsigned long max_evicts_per_relinq; > >> + unsigned long low_on_memory; > >> + unsigned long deduped_puts; > >> + unsigned long tot_good_eph_puts; > >> + int global_obj_count_max; > >> + int global_pgp_count_max; > >> + int global_pcd_count_max; > >> + int global_page_count_max; > >> + int global_rtree_node_count_max; > >> + long global_eph_count_max; > >> + unsigned long failed_copies; > >> + unsigned long pcd_tot_tze_size; > >> + unsigned long pcd_tot_csize; > >> +}; > >> + > >> +static struct tmem_statistics tmem_stats; > >> > >> /************ CORE DATA STRUCTURES ************************************/ > >> > >> @@ -225,8 +232,8 @@ static atomic_t global_rtree_node_count = > >> ATOMIC_INIT(0); > >> > >> #define atomic_inc_and_max(_c) do { \ > >> atomic_inc(&_c); \ > >> - if ( _atomic_read(_c) > _c##_max ) \ > >> - _c##_max = _atomic_read(_c); \ > >> + if ( _atomic_read(_c) > tmem_stats._c##_max ) \ > >> + tmem_stats._c##_max = _atomic_read(_c); \ > >> } while (0) > >> > >> #define atomic_dec_and_assert(_c) do { \ > >> @@ -273,7 +280,7 @@ static void *tmem_malloc(size_t size, struct tmem_pool > >> *pool) > >> v = xmem_pool_alloc(size, tmem_mempool); > >> } > >> if ( v == NULL ) > >> - alloc_failed++; > >> + tmem_stats.alloc_failed++; > >> return v; > >> } > >> > >> @@ -300,7 +307,7 @@ static struct page_info *tmem_alloc_page(struct > >> tmem_pool *pool) > >> else > >> pfp = __tmem_alloc_page(); > >> if ( pfp == NULL ) > >> - alloc_page_failed++; > >> + tmem_stats.alloc_page_failed++; > >> else > >> atomic_inc_and_max(global_page_count); > > > > So the code was previously like this but this change made me notice > > this. How come tmem_stats.global_page_count needs to be atomically > > incremented but not tmem_stats.alloc_page_failed? Its also a little > > weird that global_page_count is in the struct now but not really visible > > here while alloc_page_count is in the struct but has to be explicitly > > called out. > > > > > > Actually I just realized "global_page_count" but this patch actually > deals with "global_page_count_max". So ignore the original email. > > But does this patch compile (for bisect-ability) due to the change to > atomic_inc_and_max() but not moving "global_page_count" into the structure? Yup: #define atomic_inc_and_max(_c) do { \ atomic_inc(&_c); \ - if ( _atomic_read(_c) > _c##_max ) \ - _c##_max = _atomic_read(_c); \ + if ( _atomic_read(_c) > tmem_stats._c##_max ) \ + tmem_stats._c##_max = _atomic_read(_c); \ } while (0) As the global_page_count is still an atomic outside the structure. And the global_page_count_max is inside the structure. > > -- > Doug Goldstein > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |