[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] VMX: Remove the vcpu from the per-cpu blocking list after domain termination
On Fri, 2016-05-20 at 16:53 +0800, Feng Wu wrote: > We need to make sure the bocking vcpu is not in any per-cpu blocking > list > when the associated domain is going to be destroyed. > > Signed-off-by: Feng Wu <feng.wu@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c > @@ -248,6 +248,36 @@ void vmx_pi_hooks_deassign(struct domain *d) > d->arch.hvm_domain.vmx.pi_switch_to = NULL; > } > > +static void vmx_pi_blocking_list_cleanup(struct domain *d) > +{ > + unsigned int cpu; > + > + for_each_online_cpu ( cpu ) > + { > + struct vcpu *v; > + unsigned long flags; > + struct arch_vmx_struct *vmx, *tmp; > + spinlock_t *lock = &per_cpu(vmx_pi_blocking, cpu).lock; > + struct list_head *blocked_vcpus = &per_cpu(vmx_pi_blocking, > cpu).list; > + > + spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags); > + > + list_for_each_entry_safe(vmx, tmp, blocked_vcpus, > pi_blocking.list) > + { > + v = container_of(vmx, struct vcpu, arch.hvm_vmx); > + > + if (v->domain == d) > + { > + list_del(&vmx->pi_blocking.list); > + ASSERT(vmx->pi_blocking.lock == lock); > + vmx->pi_blocking.lock = NULL; > + } > + } > + > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags); > + } > So, I'm probably missing something very ver basic, but I don't see what's the reason why we need this loop... can't we arrange for checking list_empty(&v->arch.hvm_vmx.pi_blocking.list) ? :-O Regards, Dario -- <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) Attachment:
signature.asc _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |