[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [for-4.7 2/2] xen/arm: Document the behavior of XENMAPSPACE_dev_mmio
Hi Stefano, On 26/05/2016 10:18, Stefano Stabellini wrote: On Wed, 25 May 2016, Julien Grall wrote:On 25/05/16 14:14, Jan Beulich wrote:Also - is Device_nGnRE a term uniform between ARM32 and ARM64?Actually it should be Device-nGnRE to match with the spec. This has been introduced on Armv8. Previously for Armv7, the name was "Device", although the behavior is exactly the same. I could say: "ARM only; the region will be mapped in Stage-2 using the memory attribute 'Device-nGnRE' (previously named 'Device' on ARMv7)".Small nit: I would say "the region gets mapped" or "is mapped" rather than "will be" because that makes me think that it is a future behavior of following Xen releases rather than the current behavior. Good idea. I sent a v2 yesterday night [1]. So I will fix in the v3. Acked-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx> [1] http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-05/msg02490.html -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |