[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RESEND 3/4] qdisk, hw/block/xen_disk: Perform grant copy instead of grant map.
On Tue, 2016-05-31 at 10:37 +0100, David Vrabel wrote: > On 31/05/2016 05:44, Paulina Szubarczyk wrote: > > Grant copy operation is divided into two phases different for > > 'read' and 'write' operation. > > > > For a 'read' operation the flow is as follow: > > 1. allocate local buffers for all the segments contained in > > a request. > > Allocating buffers page-by-page looks sub-optimal to me. Why not > allocate one large buffer for the whole request? I thought about caching the pages and reuse them if there are more request. I did the change in the next patch 4/4. > > 2. fill the request io vectors with the buffers' addresses > > 3. invoke read operation by qemu device > > 4. in the completition call grant copy > > 5. free the buffers > > > > Function 'ioreq_read_init' implements 1. and 2. step. It is called > > instead of 'ioreq_map' in 'ioreq_runio_qemu_aio'. Then the function > > 'ioreq_runio_qemu_aio' continues withouth changes performing step 3. > > Steps 4. and 5. are called in the callback function > > 'qemu_aio_complete'. The ioreq_read' function is implemented for > > step 4 which calls the new function 'xc_gnttab_copy_grant' presented > > in the other part of the patch. > > > > For a 'write' operation steps 4. happens before step 2.. First data > > are copied from calling guest domains and then qemu operates on > > them. > > --- > > hw/block/xen_disk.c | 185 > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 185 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/hw/block/xen_disk.c b/hw/block/xen_disk.c > > index 3b7882e..43cd9c9 100644 > > --- a/hw/block/xen_disk.c > > +++ b/hw/block/xen_disk.c > > @@ -284,6 +284,154 @@ err: > > return -1; > > } > > > > + > > +static void* get_buffer(void) { > > + void *buf; > > + > > + buf = mmap(NULL, 1 << XC_PAGE_SHIFT, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, > > + MAP_SHARED | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0); > > + > > + if (unlikely(buf == MAP_FAILED)) > > + return NULL; > > + > > + return buf; > > +} > > + > > +static int free_buffer(void* buf) { > > + return munmap(buf, 1 << XC_PAGE_SHIFT); > > I would make this void and assert() the munmap is successful since if > buf is valid the munmap() cannot fail. This means... > > > +} > > + > > +static int free_buffers(void** page, int count) > > This can be void and... > > > +{ > > + int i, r = 0; > > + > > + for (i = 0; i < count; i++) { > > + > > + if(free_buffer(page[i])) > > + r = 1; > > + > > + page[i] = NULL; > > + } > > + > > + return r; > > +} > > + > > +static int ioreq_write(struct ioreq *ioreq) > > +{ > > + XenGnttab gnt = ioreq->blkdev->xendev.gnttabdev; > > + uint16_t domids[BLKIF_MAX_SEGMENTS_PER_REQUEST]; > > + uint32_t refs[BLKIF_MAX_SEGMENTS_PER_REQUEST]; > > + uint32_t offset[BLKIF_MAX_SEGMENTS_PER_REQUEST]; > > + uint32_t len[BLKIF_MAX_SEGMENTS_PER_REQUEST]; > > + void *pages[BLKIF_MAX_SEGMENTS_PER_REQUEST]; > > + int i, count = 0, rc, r; > > + /* Copy the data for write operation from guest grant pages addressed > > by > > + * domids, refs, offset, len to local buffers. > > + * > > + * Bufferes are then mapped to the pending request for further > > + * completition. > > + */ > > + > > + if (ioreq->v.niov == 0) { > > + r = 0; goto out; > > + } > > + > > + count = ioreq->v.niov; > > + for (i = 0; i < count; i++) { > > + domids[i] = ioreq->domids[i]; > > + refs[i] = ioreq->refs[i]; > > + offset[i] = ioreq->req.seg[i].first_sect * ioreq->blkdev->file_blk; > > + len[i] = (ioreq->req.seg[i].last_sect - > > ioreq->req.seg[i].first_sect + 1) > > + * ioreq->blkdev->file_blk; > > + pages[i] = get_buffer(); > > + > > + if(!pages[i]) { > > + xen_be_printf(&ioreq->blkdev->xendev, 0, > > + "failed to alloc page, errno %d \n", errno); > > + r = 1; goto out; > > + } > > + } > > + rc = xc_gnttab_copy_grant(gnt, count, domids, refs, pages, offset, > > len, 1); > > + > > + if(rc) { > > + xen_be_printf(&ioreq->blkdev->xendev, 0, > > + "failed to copy data for write %d \n", rc); > > + > > + if(free_buffers(ioreq->page, ioreq->v.niov)) { > > + xen_be_printf(&ioreq->blkdev->xendev, 0, > > + "failed to free page, errno %d \n", errno); > > + } > > + r = 1; goto out; > > + } > > + > > + for (i = 0; i < ioreq->v.niov; i++) { > > + ioreq->page[i] = pages[i]; > > + ioreq->v.iov[i].iov_base += (uintptr_t)pages[i]; > > + } > > + > > + r = 0; > > +out: > > + return r; > > +} > > + > > +static int ioreq_read_init(struct ioreq *ioreq) > > +{ > > + int i; > > + > > + if (ioreq->v.niov == 0) { > > + return 0; > > + } > > + > > + for (i = 0; i < ioreq->v.niov; i++) { > > + ioreq->page[i] = get_buffer(); > > + if(!ioreq->page[i]) { > > + return -1; > > + } > > + ioreq->v.iov[i].iov_base += (uintptr_t)ioreq->page[i]; > > + } > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +static int ioreq_read(struct ioreq *ioreq) > > +{ > > + XenGnttab gnt = ioreq->blkdev->xendev.gnttabdev; > > + uint16_t domids[BLKIF_MAX_SEGMENTS_PER_REQUEST]; > > + uint32_t refs[BLKIF_MAX_SEGMENTS_PER_REQUEST]; > > + uint32_t offset[BLKIF_MAX_SEGMENTS_PER_REQUEST]; > > + uint32_t len[BLKIF_MAX_SEGMENTS_PER_REQUEST]; > > + void *pages[BLKIF_MAX_SEGMENTS_PER_REQUEST]; > > + int i, count = 0, rc; > > + > > + /* Copy the data from local buffers to guest grant pages addressed by > > + * domids, refs, offset on the completition of read operation. > > + */ > > + > > + if (ioreq->v.niov == 0) { > > + return 0; > > + } > > + > > + count = ioreq->v.niov; > > + for (i = 0; i < count; i++) { > > + domids[i] = ioreq->domids[i]; > > + refs[i] = ioreq->refs[i]; > > + offset[i] = ioreq->req.seg[i].first_sect * ioreq->blkdev->file_blk; > > + len[i] = (ioreq->req.seg[i].last_sect - > > ioreq->req.seg[i].first_sect + 1) > > + * ioreq->blkdev->file_blk; > > + pages[i] = ioreq->v.iov[i].iov_base; > > + } > > You can build the ops for read/write at the same time using the same > code as the only difference is the direction. > > + > > + rc = xc_gnttab_copy_grant(gnt, count, domids, refs, pages, offset, > > len, 0); > > + > > + if(rc) { > > + xen_be_printf(&ioreq->blkdev->xendev, 0, > > + "failed to copy data to guest %d \n", rc); > > + return -1; > > + } > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > static int ioreq_runio_qemu_aio(struct ioreq *ioreq); > > > > static void qemu_aio_complete(void *opaque, int ret) > > @@ -313,6 +461,22 @@ static void qemu_aio_complete(void *opaque, int ret) > > } > > > > ioreq->status = ioreq->aio_errors ? BLKIF_RSP_ERROR : BLKIF_RSP_OKAY; > > + > > + switch(ioreq->req.operation) { > > + case BLKIF_OP_READ: > > + if(ioreq_read(ioreq)) { > > + xen_be_printf(&ioreq->blkdev->xendev, 0, > > + "failed to copy read data to guest\n"); > > You need to report the failure back to the frontend. > > > + } > > Need a comment here since you're deliberating missing the "break". > > > + case BLKIF_OP_WRITE: > > + if(free_buffers(ioreq->page, ioreq->v.niov)) { > > ...you don't need to consider errors here (see comment on free_buffer() > above). Thank you for all the above remarks I will correct the code. Paulina _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |