[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 16/20] x86/vlapic: Don't try to accept 8259 interrupt if !has_vpic()



>>> On 06.04.16 at 03:25, <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vlapic.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vlapic.c
> @@ -1133,6 +1133,9 @@ void vlapic_adjust_i8259_target(struct domain *d)
>  {
>      struct vcpu *v;
>  
> +    if ( !has_vpic(d) )
> +       return;

Considering the title of the patch (which doesn't match the function
you alter) - wouldn't this better go into __vlapic_accept_pic_intr()?
It missing here I have more problems to see any harm than from it
missing there. (Arguably _also_ putting it here then would have the
benefit of avoiding a for_each_vcpu() loop.)

In any event this looks like a relatively independent change.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.