[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] libxenvchan license (lGPLv2.1) and xen/include/public/COPYING license?
Hey! I picked the list of people on this email from the git log on tools/misc/libvchan/ (albeit this is about xen/include/public/io/libxenvchan.h). The problem is that the 'COPYING' file in the root directory of Xen source says: " Licensing Exceptions (the relaxed BSD-style license) ---------------------------------------------------- For the convenience of users and those who are porting OSes to run as Xen guests, certain files in this repository are not subject to the GPL when distributed separately or included in software packages outside this repository." The libxenvchan.h header file is an Lesser GPLv2.1. Which would imply that one could ignore the giant @section LICENSE in the libxenvchan.h and treat it as non-GPL... But to make the matters more complicated the ./COPYING files continues with: "Instead we specify a much more relaxed BSD-style license. Affected files include the Xen interface headers (xen/include/public/COPYING), MiniOS (extras/mini-os) and various drivers, support functions and header files within Xen-aware Linux source trees. In all such cases, license terms are stated at the top of the file or in a COPYING file in the same directory. Note that _any_ file that is modified and then distributed within a Linux kernel is still subject to the GNU GPL. " Great, so if I break this up: a) "Xen interface headers (xen/include/public/COPYING)," b) "MiniOS (..) and various drivers," c) "support functions and header files with Xen-aware Linux source trees." Well, libxenvchan is a). What? Yes, if I look in xen/include/public/COPYING it says: " XEN NOTICE ========== This copyright applies to all files within this subdirectory and its subdirectories: include/public/*.h include/public/hvm/*.h include/public/io/*.h The intention is that these files can be freely copied into the source tree of an operating system when porting that OS to run on Xen. Doing so does *not* cause the OS to become subject to the terms of the GPL " and libxenvchan.h is in ./xen/include/public/io/libxenvchan.h Also it is in FreeBSD (source tree): ./sys/xen/interface/io/libxenvchan.h That looks to be an oversigh. The commit that introduced the file is: commit 1a16a3351ff2f2cf9f0cc0a27c89a0652eb8dfb4 Author: Daniel De Graaf <dgdegra@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu Oct 6 19:44:40 2011 +0100 libvchan: interdomain communications library As such I was wondering if the folks who wrote/checked the file in could weight in on what their intention was in regards to this file? Thanks! _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |