[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RESEND 06/14] libxl/arm: Construct ACPI FADT table

To: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>, Shannon Zhao <zhaoshenglong@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 22:13:05 +0800
Cc: wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx, sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx, ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, peter.huangpeng@xxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 07 Jun 2016 14:13:17 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

On 2016年06月07日 21:17, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hello Shannon,
> 
> It just occurred to me that the way to build the ACPI tables, I am not
> speaking about the value, is very similar to what QEMU does.
> 
Yeah, TBH, I really refer to that in QEMU and there is no special
difference between them to build the tables. And it's also similar to
what we do to generate the ACPI tables for Dom0.

-- 
Shannon

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RESEND 06/14] libxl/arm: Construct ACPI FADT table
  - From: Julien Grall

References:
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RESEND 06/14] libxl/arm: Construct ACPI FADT table
  - From: Julien Grall

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 19/20] acpi: Set HW_REDUCED_ACPI in FADT if IOAPIC is not supported
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 1/2] xen-pciback: return proper values during BAR sizing
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RESEND 06/14] libxl/arm: Construct ACPI FADT table
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RESEND 06/14] libxl/arm: Construct ACPI FADT table
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.