[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for 4.7] libxenvchan: Change license of header from Lesser GPL v2.1 to BSD
- To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Ian Campbell <ijc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 16:00:25 +0100
- Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>, Olaf Hering <olaf@xxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>, Anil Madhavapeddy <anil@xxxxxxxxxx>, George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Matthew Daley <mattjd@xxxxxxxxx>, Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx>, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki <marmarek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jason Andryuk <andryuk@xxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Daniel De Graaf <dgdegra@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 15:00:45 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>
On Fri, 2016-06-10 at 09:31 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > So, I guess I don't really undertstand the case for / desire to
> > > relicense tools/libvchan/libxenvchan.h, especially given that the
> > > other
> > > tools/libvchan/*.[ch] files don't appear to be being relicensed
> > > in [0].
> Just consistency.
I'd say it introduces a (far) bigger inconsistency than it avoids.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
