[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)
On 09/06/16 16:04, Ian Jackson wrote: > Roger Pau Monne writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 > bugfix)"): >> This series contains a bugfix for the build infrastructure and a basic >> launcher for XTF. Patches can also be found in the following git repo: >> >> git://xenbits.xen.org/people/royger/xen-test-framework.git launcher_v1 > IMO we should give this thing a proper repo in the root of the xenbits > git namespace. > > I'm slightly concerned that `xen-test-framework' is a bit vague. It > sounds like a CI system (of which we already have at least three ...), > rather than a collection of tests based on tiny VMs, each designed to > make specific demands of the host environment. > > Andrew, do you have other naming ideas ? I don't object to "xtf" but > that's just an acronym, and the expansion is confusing. I think > qualifying the somehow might be useful. > > Others: do you have opinions ? Is my concern ill-founded ? The XTF name has been around for 2 years now. Out of curiosity, I searched for it on google, and found my written documentation as the top hit. https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=xen+test+framework&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&gws_rd=cr&ei=InxeV52HDYHc-QG0-qN4 The snippet summary includes the first line of the introduction, "This is both a framework for creating microkernel-based tests, and a suite of tests built using the framework", which should be sufficient clarification for anyone with questions. I am not completely averse to changing it, but I don't see an alternative which is any better or clearer. ~Andrew _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |