[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 04/17] libxl/arm: prepare for constructing ACPI tables
On 2016年06月23日 21:37, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Thu, 23 Jun 2016, Shannon Zhao wrote: >> + >> + if (strcmp(dom->guest_type, "xen-3.0-aarch64")) { >> + LOG(DEBUG, "Do not generate ACPI tables for %s", dom->guest_type); >> + state->config.acpi = false; > > Shouldn't we return here? > Ah, right, thanks! > >> + } >> + >> + return libxl__prepare_acpi(gc, info, state, dom); >> } >> >> static void finalise_one_memory_node(libxl__gc *gc, void *fdt, >> diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_arm_acpi.c b/tools/libxl/libxl_arm_acpi.c >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..60c31f9 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_arm_acpi.c >> @@ -0,0 +1,85 @@ >> +/* >> + * ARM DmoU ACPI generation >> + * >> + * Copyright (C) 2008-2010 Kevin O'Connor <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> + * Copyright (C) 2006 Fabrice Bellard >> + * Copyright (C) 2013 Red Hat Inc >> + * >> + * Author: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> >> + * >> + * Copyright (c) 2015 HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO.,LTD. >> + * >> + * Author: Shannon Zhao <zhaoshenglong@xxxxxxxxxx> >> + * >> + * Copyright (C) 2016 Linaro Ltd. >> + * >> + * Author: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Uhm... If in doubt just remove all the Author lines: git log provides > more than enough information about who wrote this code. > Ahm... Julien suggested I should import the copyright from QEMU since I refer to that. While what I didn't say before is that even if I didn't refer to QEMU codes, the implementation will be like this because for the tables except DSDT we just fill in the contents of the tables. But for DSDT generation, it's totally different compared with QEMU. I think I'll remove this. :) Thanks, -- Shannon _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |