Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)

[Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 07/07/16 12:10, Lars Kurth wrote:
>> On 6 Jul 2016, at 15:22, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Looking at the above, it occurs to me that, this whole area seems to be a
>>> little inconsistent anyway and could do with a little house-keeping. We
>>> have
>>> - osstest.git
>>> - there also is osstest/*.git which seems to be odd and seems to have been
>>> inactive for a while (not very clear to me what these do)
>>> - and we have old and inactive xentesttools/*.git
>> They are not inactive. I have some patches for it and we are using
>> it (Boris and me).
> That is good to know.
>
>>> - and we are adding a new repo for XTF
>>>
>>>
>>> Maybe, moving everything test related under testing/* or test/* would be
>>> sensible, but that would cause some disruption (not sure how bad that
>>> would be). It would address A, B and D. It wouldn't make C much worse than
>>> now.
>> I don't mind the xentesttools going under a 'test' directory. 
> @Ian, @George: Any other views regarding say osstest and the other osstest/* 
> directories? 
>
> @Andrew: would something like test/xtf.git work

It would, although given a straight choice I would prefer
xen-test-framework.git over its abbreviation.

~Andrew

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel