Re: [Xen-devel] (no subject)

[Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 2016-07-07 at 13:48 +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 07/07/16 12:03, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > On Thu, 2016-07-07 at 10:36 +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> > > Could you re-send this with the trace change moved from the
> > > previous
> > > patch to this patch?
> > > 
> > So, you're saying I should change both Xen, xentrace_format and
> > xenalyze.c all at once, in the same patch, right?
> > 
> But now that xenalyze is in-tree, I think we want to avoid situations
> where the in-tree xenalyze is broken, even just for one changeset, if
> we
> can avoid it.
> 
Ok, this makes sense. Will do.

Thanks and Regards,
Dario
-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel