[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 01/17] libxl/arm: Factor out codes for generating DTB
On 07/07/16 16:48, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: On 07/07/2016 11:41 AM, Wei Liu wrote:On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 11:12:31AM +0800, Shannon Zhao wrote:From: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@xxxxxxxxxx> Factor out codes for generating DTB to prepare for adding ACPI tables generation codes. Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx> --- tools/libxl/libxl_arm.c | 18 ++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_arm.c b/tools/libxl/libxl_arm.c index ddd80aa..4a57dd7 100644 --- a/tools/libxl/libxl_arm.c +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_arm.c @@ -747,10 +747,9 @@ static int copy_partial_fdt(libxl__gc *gc, void *fdt, void *pfdt) #define FDT_MAX_SIZE (1<<20) -int libxl__arch_domain_init_hw_description(libxl__gc *gc, - libxl_domain_build_info *info, - libxl__domain_build_state *state, - struct xc_dom_image *dom) +static int libxl__prepare_dtb(libxl__gc *gc, libxl_domain_build_info *info, + libxl__domain_build_state *state, + struct xc_dom_image *dom)I've queued this up for committing and will fix the indentation as I go along.I don't think this can be ready for committing since it sits on top of my not-yet-reviewed series (which is pretty much guaranteed to require a new spin). This is only used by the ARM code which you don't modify. So I don't see any issue to commit this patch. Regards, -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |