Re: [Xen-devel] [DRAFT 1] XenSock protocol design document

[David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 08/07/16 17:52, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> 
>> c) My belief that most of the advantages of this proposal can be
>> achieved with smarts in the backend.
> 
> By backend do you mean netfront/netback? If so, I have already pointed
> out why that is not the case in previous emails as well as in this
> design document.
> 
> If you remain unconvinced of the usefulness of this work, that's OK, we
> can agree to disagree. Many people work on things I don't believe
> particularly useful myself. I am not asking you to spend any time on
> this if you don't believe it serves a purpose. But please let the rest
> of the community work constructively together.

If you're only going to implement userspace frontends and backends, then
sure I can step out of this discussion.  However, your initial prototype
drivers suggest you're aiming at in-kernel drivers.

David

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel