[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/arm: map_dev_mmio_region: The iomem permission check should be done on MFN
On Wed, 15 Jun 2016, Shannon Zhao wrote: > Hi Julien, > > On 2016/6/14 19:50, Julien Grall wrote: > > The helper iomem_access_permitted expects MFNs in parameters and not > > GNFs. Thankfully only the hardware domain can call this function and > > it will always be with GFNS == MFNs for now. > > > > Also, fix the printf to use the MFN range and not the GFN one. > > > > Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx> > > Cc: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Reviewed-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@xxxxxxxxxx> Shannon, thanks for your help reviewing this. Acked-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx> I'll commit. > > --- > > This patch is a good candidate to backport to Xen 4.7. Without > > it, the hardware domain can map any MMIO because the permission > > check is done on the GPFNs and not the MNFs. > > --- > > xen/arch/arm/p2m.c | 4 ++-- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/p2m.c b/xen/arch/arm/p2m.c > > index 6a19c57..4c6547d 100644 > > --- a/xen/arch/arm/p2m.c > > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/p2m.c > > @@ -1275,14 +1275,14 @@ int map_dev_mmio_region(struct domain *d, > > { > > int res; > > > > - if ( !(nr && iomem_access_permitted(d, start_gfn, start_gfn + nr - 1)) > > ) > > + if ( !(nr && iomem_access_permitted(d, mfn, mfn + nr - 1)) ) > > return 0; > > > > res = map_mmio_regions(d, start_gfn, nr, mfn); > > if ( res < 0 ) > > { > > printk(XENLOG_G_ERR "Unable to map [%#lx - %#lx] in Dom%d\n", > > - start_gfn, start_gfn + nr - 1, d->domain_id); > > + mfn, mfn + nr - 1, d->domain_id); > > return res; > > } > > > > > > -- > Shannon > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |