[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/8] x86: audit and remove needless module.h includes
[Re: [PATCH 0/8] x86: audit and remove needless module.h includes] On 14/07/2016 (Thu 15:04) Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > To that end, I have done allmodconfig, allyesconfig and allnoconfig > > for both 32 bit and 64 bit x86 with these changes on the linux-next > > from today, which presumably has an up to date copy of tip in it. > > It does, still I get this on allnoconfig with your patches applied: Took me a while to figure out why I didn't see this; I was able to finally reproduce it on x86-32 with allnoconfig but CONFIG_SMP=y. > > arch/x86/kernel/setup_percpu.c: In function ‘setup_percpu_segment’: > arch/x86/kernel/setup_percpu.c:159:2: error: implicit declaration of function > ‘pack_descriptor’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > pack_descriptor(&gdt, per_cpu_offset(cpu), 0xFFFFF, > ^ > arch/x86/kernel/setup_percpu.c:162:2: error: implicit declaration of function > ‘write_gdt_entry’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > write_gdt_entry(get_cpu_gdt_table(cpu), > ^ > arch/x86/kernel/setup_percpu.c:162:18: error: implicit declaration of > function > ‘get_cpu_gdt_table’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > write_gdt_entry(get_cpu_gdt_table(cpu), All three of these guys live in asm/desc.h and adding that to the top of arch/x86/kernel/setup_percpu.c asm include list seems to fix the reproducer I now have here. > > I'll continue testing with the setup_percpu.c change left out. Let me know if you want a resend or if you want to just add the asm/desc.h locally or ... Paul. -- > > Thanks, > > Ingo _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |