Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/3] xen: Some code motion to avoid having to do forward-declaration

[George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 18/07/16 10:58, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-07-15 at 19:02 +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
>> For sched_credit2, move the vcpu insert / remove / free functions
>> near the domain
>> insert / remove / alloc / free functions (and after cpu_pick).
>>
>> For sched_rt, move rt_cpu_pick() further up.
>>
>> This is pure code motion; no functional change.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> CC: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> CC: Anshul Makkar <anshul.makkar@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> CC: Meng Xu <mengxu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
> Acked-by: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> If this goes in (and it should), I'll have to rebase my Credit2 series
> and resend it.
> 
> I'm fine with that, but I'll wait to see if people has comments, so
> I'll take cara of both (comments and rebasing) in v3.
> 
> If there won't be comment, I'd just resend/provide a git branch with
> the rebased patches.

So for one, your series was sent first, so if it's in decent shape it
should get priority.  For two, just rebasing this series should be a lot
easier than rebasing your entire series; so unless your series gets held
up for some reason, I think this should probably be rebased on top of yours.

 -George

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel