Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] tools: remove systemd xenstore socket definitions

[Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Andrew Cooper writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] tools: remove systemd 
xenstore socket definitions"):
> However, calling what previously exists WRT xenstored stubdomains as
> "supported" is laughable.  The lack of integration meant that anyone
> trying to use it had to make intrusive modifications to make it start
> properly, and the lack of MiniOS ballooning shows that inadequate
> consideration was given to production usecases.  It is disingenuous
> pretend that stub-xenstored is anywhere beyond "demo" in terms of
> real-world usage at the moment.

Well, I may well be wrong about how well it was supported before.  I
don't remember these problems but it's been a long time since I have
actually seen reports of stub xenstored in use.

I'm glad to see that you support improvements.

But I think you need to be more careful with your use of language.
`Disingenuous' implies dishonesty.

thanks,
Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel