[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/4] docs: Clarify the expected behaviour of zero length records

To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
From: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 10:45:50 +0100
Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 09:46:05 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 06:17:34PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> The sending side shouldn't send any variable sized records which end up having
> zero content, but the receiving side will need to tolerate such records for
> compatibility purposes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

References:
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/4] Fix issues with zero-length records in migration v2
  - From: Andrew Cooper
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/4] docs: Clarify the expected behaviour of zero length records
  - From: Andrew Cooper

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] systemd: drop dependency on proc-xen.mount in xendriverdomain.service
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] systemd: drop dependency on proc-xen.mount in xendriverdomain.service
Previous by thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/4] docs: Clarify the expected behaviour of zero length records
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/4] docs: Clarify the expected behaviour of zero length records
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.