[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH XTF 3/3] xtf-runner: regularise runner exit code
On 25/07/16 12:25, Ian Jackson wrote: > Andrew Cooper writes ("Re: [PATCH XTF 3/3] xtf-runner: regularise runner exit > code"): >> On 22/07/16 10:29, Wei Liu wrote: >>> This would cause a FAILURE to overwrite previous ERROR result. Is that >>> what you want? >> When running more than one test, the overall result should be the most >> severe. So yes, a subsequent FAILURE should override an ERROR. > "Error" is surely a more severe problem than "Failure". No. Error means "something unexpected went wrong", while Failure is "the test worked, and identified that the area under test is defective". Error is typically a test case bug or infrastructure issue. > In particular, Error might mask a failure. Indeed it could. Either should cause a prompt investigation and effort to resolve the issues, but one must be more severe than the other and this is the way things are specified. ~Andrew _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |