[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: add static initialization of steal_clock op to xen_time_ops

To: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 16:26:22 +0100
Cc: boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx, david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 15:26:32 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

On 26/07/16 13:15, Juergen Gross wrote:
> pv_time_ops might be overwritten with xen_time_ops after the
> steal_clock operation has been initialized already. To prevent calling
> a now uninitialized function pointer add the steal_clock static
> initialization to xen_time_ops.

Applied to for-linus-4.8, thanks.

David

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

References:
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: add static initialization of steal_clock op to xen_time_ops
  - From: Juergen Gross

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8] x86/mem-sharing: mem-sharing a range of memory
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] live migrating hvm from 4.4 to 4.7 fails in ioreq server
Previous by thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: add static initialization of steal_clock op to xen_time_ops
Next by thread: [Xen-devel] [ovmf baseline-only test] 66812: all pass
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.