|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] replace bogus -ENOSYS uses
>>> On 11.08.16 at 20:10, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 09/08/16 11:40, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/mtrr/main.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/mtrr/main.c
>> @@ -332,7 +332,7 @@ int mtrr_add_page(unsigned long base, un
>> if ((type == MTRR_TYPE_WRCOMB) && !have_wrcomb()) {
>> printk(KERN_WARNING
>> "mtrr: your processor doesn't support
>> write-combining\n");
>> - return -ENOSYS;
>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> Will this break the classic-xen MTRR code? ISTR it was very picky, from
> the cpuid work.
There are no -ENOSYS checks in there afaics, and I also can't
otherwise see any way for this change to break it.
> Also, as some further cleanup, that printk should
> become a print-once.
Well, for a message that presumably would never actually get
issued (as I'm unaware of 64-bit capable CPUs not supporting
WC) I don't think this sort of cleanup has a really high priority.
Certainly not in this patch.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |