[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 1/6] VMX: Statically assign two PI hooks
> -----Original Message----- > From: Jan Beulich [mailto:JBeulich@xxxxxxxx] > Sent: Thursday, September 1, 2016 4:17 PM > To: Wu, Feng <feng.wu@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx; dario.faggioli@xxxxxxxxxx; > george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Tian, Kevin <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>; xen- > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] VMX: Statically assign two PI hooks > > >>> On 31.08.16 at 05:56, <feng.wu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c > > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c > > @@ -207,8 +207,6 @@ void vmx_pi_hooks_assign(struct domain *d) > > ASSERT(!d->arch.hvm_domain.vmx.vcpu_block); > > > > d->arch.hvm_domain.vmx.vcpu_block = vmx_vcpu_block; > > - d->arch.hvm_domain.vmx.pi_switch_from = vmx_pi_switch_from; > > - d->arch.hvm_domain.vmx.pi_switch_to = vmx_pi_switch_to; > > d->arch.hvm_domain.vmx.pi_do_resume = vmx_pi_do_resume; > > } > > I'm sure I've said so before: While I can see why you want the > adjustment to vmx_pi_hooks_deassign(), I don't see why leaving > out this and ... As mentioned in the comments of this patch, these two hooks are also needed for CPU side PI, so we cannot install here and ... > > > @@ -236,6 +232,12 @@ static int vmx_domain_initialise(struct domain *d) > > if ( (rc = vmx_alloc_vlapic_mapping(d)) != 0 ) > > return rc; > > > > + if ( iommu_intpost ) > > + { > > + d->arch.hvm_domain.vmx.pi_switch_from = vmx_pi_switch_from; > > + d->arch.hvm_domain.vmx.pi_switch_to = vmx_pi_switch_to; > > + } > > + > > return 0; > > } > > ... this would conflict with the goal of the patch. ... Yes this is incorrect, I should install these two hooks when CPU side PI is supported. Thanks, Feng > > Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |