Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 1/1] xen: move TLB-flush filtering out into populate_physmap

[David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 06/09/16 10:52, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 06/09/16 10:39, David Vrabel wrote:
>> On 06/09/16 09:42, Dongli Zhang wrote:
>>> This patch implemented parts of TODO left in commit id
>>> a902c12ee45fc9389eb8fe54eeddaf267a555c58. It moved TLB-flush filtering out
>>> into populate_physmap.
>>>
>>> Because of TLB-flush in alloc_heap_pages, it's very slow to create a guest
>>> with memory size of more than 100GB on host with 100+ cpus.
>>>
>>> This patch introduced a "MEMF_no_tlbflush" bit to memflag to indicate
>>> whether TLB-flush should be done in alloc_heap_pages or its caller
>>> populate_physmap.  Once this bit is set in memflag, alloc_heap_pages will
>>> ignore TLB-flush.
>>
>> This makes pages accessible to the guest B, when guest A may still have
>> a cached mapping to them.
>>
>> I think it is only safe to do this when guest B is being constructed.
> 
> Only before the populate_physmap hypercall returns, right?  In order to
> run afoul of this, a second vcpu on the guest would have to map and then
> put something secret / sensitive in the memory (such as a private key
> which guest A could then read, or code it intended to execute that guest
> A could then modify) before the hypercall finished.  That seems like
> something we should be able to document as undefined / unsafe behavior
> if we want.

I think populate_physmap can replace existing p2m entries, and thus
guest B may already have mappings.

David

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel